Curiosity pattern
- Query sounds broad, education-heavy, low urgency
- Clicks happen, sales handoffs do not
- Repeats weekly because no negative discipline
Most accounts don’t have a bidding problem first. They have a search-terms hygiene problem: curiosity queries left open, buyer queries left unclaimed.

Most accounts leak budget in the search terms report before they leak in bidding strategy. If you do one discipline every week, do this one.
Don't let both classes live in the same ad group and expect stable CPA.
Curiosity pattern
Buyer pattern
Campaign naming can look clean while the search terms report is quietly buying non-buyers. If you only review top-line CPA, you miss the query-level leaks that actually set lead quality.
The weekly operator loop is simple: mine terms, filter junk, promote winners, and route each intent cluster to the right page. This is how you stop paying premium CPCs for research clicks that never close.
Start with intent mismatches sales would never call qualified. Keep this list open while reviewing live terms.
When a query shows buyer intent and survives lead-quality checks, claim it deliberately. Don’t leave proven terms buried in mixed ad groups where RSA relevance and page matching get diluted.
If conversion tracking is inflated or page message match is weak, search-term decisions drift fast. A “winner” query on dirty conversion data is still fiction.
Use this alongside conversion tracking hygiene and Search structure discipline so promotions are based on qualified outcomes, not vanity conversion volume.
Use Google's baseline on Search terms insights for mechanics, then pressure-test term quality against conversion tracking signal quality and Search structure discipline.
Send your vertical, monthly Search spend, and whether calls or forms close deals — I’ll tell you where search terms, tracking, or page match is leaking money first.